Skip to content

Back to Our Blog

Empire Center: Single Payer “Sticker Shock”

Blog Categories

March 17, 2022

A new report from the Empire Center for Public Policy details how expensive a single payer healthcare system would be in New York. The full report is available here.

The report notes that the New York Health Act (NYHA) would radically reform New York’s tax structure. The bill calls for a “progressively graduated” tax on both income and payroll; however, the exact rates are not specified in the legislation. This is, in part, because the bill sponsors are also unaware of how much revenue the state would need to finance a single payer healthcare system. However, the latest estimate by the RAND Corporation is that New York would need an additional $157 billion in revenue to operate a single payer system. By removing cost controls, this number could grow.

Raising this revenue would require the largest tax increase in history. The report estimated that, to raise the needed revenue, the top tax rate would increase to 36% — which would be three times the top rate in California, the state with the second highest tax rate. New York would become an extreme outlier in taxes.

NYHA advocates claim that while taxes would increase under the NYHA, premiums would lower, leading to a net savings for many New Yorkers. The RAND Corporation estimates that such a tax structure would mean 65% of New Yorkers end up saving money, 4% pay about the same, and 31% see additional costs. Although this may appear more progressive initially, the report notes that NYHA would add significant incentives for outmigration, especially among top earners and high-producing businesses. Losing top taxpayers would shift more of the cost burden onto middle and lower income families, eliminating the bill’s intended benefit.

In years where healthcare costs increase or state revenues decrease, taxpayers would face significant pressure and additional tax hikes to keep the NYHA system solvent.

Lastly, the report notes that the NYHA would cause concern for doctors and medical providers, who would experience income changes that may repel them from New York.

The report details the concerns that the BNP and employers have raised since the NYHA was introduced three decades ago. The NYHA would dramatically increase taxes for many businesses and families, create incentives for outmigration, and discourage medical professionals from practicing in our state.

Read the full report hereand take action on this issue here. 

Related Posts

Emily Jaworski Staff Spotlight

Staff Spotlight: Meet Emily Jaworski

By communications@thepartnership.org | September 8, 2025

The Buffalo Niagara Partnership is thrilled to welcome Emily Jaworski as its new Manager of External Affairs for the NY SMART I-Corridor. Get to know her in this brief Q&A.

Inside the room: What lawmakers told employers at BNP’s 2025 Policy Perspective

By communications@thepartnership.org | July 31, 2025

The BNP hosted Policy Perspective, a piece of the BNP’s annual Government Affairs series. The standing-room-only crowd heard from three of our region’s most influential lawmakers: Assembly Majority Leader Crystal Peoples-Stokes, Senator April Baskin, and Senator Patrick Gallivan. The lawmakers spoke on a panel moderated by BNP Director of Government Affairs Josh Veronica.

Bridging the Gap Conference Strengthens New York’s Semiconductor Supply Chain

By communications@thepartnership.org | July 16, 2025

Blog Back to Our Blog The University at Buffalo’s Bridging the Gap: Activating the Semiconductor Supply Chain Network conference connected leaders, manufacturers, and regional stakeholders for a two-day conversation on how to grow New York’s presence in the global semiconductor industry. Held July 15-16 at the UB Center for the Arts and Alfiero Center, the…

Policy focus: Power Trends Report underscores energy concerns

By communications@thepartnership.org | June 12, 2025

The New York Independent System Operator released its annual Power Trends report, which details the state of New York’s electric grid. The report’s findings are concerning and underscore the need for a more sensible approach to climate and energy policy.