Skip Navigation

665 Main Street, Suite 200, Buffalo, NY  •  716.852.7100
  1. ABOUT US
    1. Who We Are
    2. Board of Directors
    3. Business Directory
    4. Membership
    5. Staff Directory
    6. Strategic Partners
    7. Major Investors
    8. Preferred Vendors
    9. Support the Partnership
  2. ADVOCACY
    1. Where We Stand
    2. Legislative Action Agendas
    3. Regional Agenda
    4. Political Action
    5. Great Lakes Metro Chambers
    6. Advocate Now: Action Alert
    7. PartnershipAdvocacy.com
  3. EXPERTISE
    1. Accelerate Upstate
    2. Buffalo Building Reuse Project
    3. Bright Choices Insurance Program
    4. Business Intelligence
    5. Economic Development Resources
    6. The Expert Forum
    7. Leadership Forum
    8. SellingHive
    9. Target Industries
  4. CONNECTIONS
    1. Events
    2. Athena Awards
    3. Innovate 2011
    4. Buffalo Niagara 360 Young Professionals
    5. 2011 Annual Report to Membership
    6. Sponsorships
    7. The HobNob & CEO Auction
  5. NEWS
    1. Press Room
    2. Email from the President
    3. Partnership Blog
    4. Monthly Newsletter
    5. Partnership in the News
    6. Videos

Home > ADVOCACY > Where We Stand > Comment to NAIC

May 21, 2010

Mr. Lou Felice
Chair, Health Care Reform Solvency Impact Subgroup

Mr. Steven Ostlund 
Chair, Accident & Health Working Group 

National Association of Insurance Commissioners
2301 McGee Street, Suite 800
Kansas City, Missouri 64108

Dear Mr. Felice, Mr. Ostlund, and NAIC Subgroup Members:

On behalf of the 2,500 employer members of the Buffalo Niagara Partnership, I urge the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) to recommend a broad definition of “quality improvement activities” related to the calculation of medical loss ratios (MLRs) under Section 2718 of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA).

While the Partnership understands that the intent of the new MLR provision is to prevent insurers from spending too many premium dollars on administrative costs, we support the inclusion of a wide array of quality improvement activities including wellness programs, disease management programs, patient support systems, and health information technology tools. 

Health plan providers must have the freedom to spend premium dollars on critical components of effective preventative health care including smoking cessation, counseling, fitness incentive programs, and the development of personal electronic medical records. Due to the importance of these value-added services, a “narrow” definition of quality improvement activities will adversely impact spending on vital health plan activities, increase costs for employers, and jeopardize valuable programs that can increase the health of our region’s workforce, and ultimately lower health care costs.

The Partnership encourages NAIC to develop a MLR calculation that includes a range of valuable services and tools ensuring that Buffalo Niagara employers can continue to offer high-quality health benefits to their employees.

Sincerely,

Andrew J. Rudnick